Judges 9:1-6      Choosing Lesser Evils

Rev. David Holwick   ZK

First Baptist Church

Ledgewood, New Jersey

October 30, 2016

                                                   Judges 9:1-6


                  CHOOSING LESSER EVILS



  I. Sometimes your options are very limited.

      A. The best bad ideas.


         The movie "Argo" is about a bold attempt to get hidden American

            diplomats out of Iran after our embassy was seized.

         The CIA brainstormed various ways to do it.

         They proposed giving them IDs as teachers, but all the foreign

            schools had been shut down months earlier.

         They thought they could make them humanitarian aid workers,

            but they weren't sure if Iran had any starving kids.

         Then someone came up with the idea of smuggling bikes to them

            and letting them pedal to another country.


         Finally one of them proposed setting up a fake movie to be

            shot in Tehran.

         The diplomats would become the film crew, and after doing

            setup work around the city they would fly out.

         They presented their idea to the director of the CIA.

            He thought it was pretty far-fetched.

         The CIA agents defend the plan by saying, "We think everybody

            knows Hollywood people.

         And everybody knows they would shoot in Stalingrad with

            Pol Pot directing if it'd sell tickets.

         There are only bad options.

            It's about finding the best one."


         The director asks, "You don't have a better bad idea than this?"

         The agents respond, "This is the best bad idea we have, sir.

            By far."                                                  [1]


      B. Our election has a lot of people unnerved.

          1) One article said 41% of Americans have election anxiety.

          2) Americans elections are much longer than most countries'

                and a lot of negativity spews out 24 hours a day.

          3) Both candidates have had dirt dug up on them.

              a) Significant numbers of voters don't like either of them.

              b) Yet we realize a great deal is at stake: the economy,

                    global conflict, worldwide trade, the Supreme Court.

          4) What do you do when you face lousy choices?

              a) How do you decide on the best worst option?


II. We live in an imperfect world.

      A. Unless Jesus is on the ballot, you will be voting for a sinner.

          1) Every human has sinned and falls short of the glory of God.

          2) This is true for Democrats, Republicans, and Independents.

          3) Therefore every election is a choice between the lesser

                of evils.

          4) And every personal decision YOU make is made by a sinner.

              a) Politicians are not the only ones who sin.


      B. We cannot forfeit our responsibility.

          1) Citizens are an office in a democracy.

              a) We all bear responsibility for the actions of the

                    leaders we elect.

              b) They may lie to us, and misrepresent themselves to us,

                    but we are still obligated to choose the best one.

          2) In elections, we have to make a choice, and we have to

                consider morality and values.

              a) Just because we are all sinners, doesn't mean sin

                    doesn't count.

              b) Baptist leader Russell Moore points out that Jesus said

                   that all who lust are adulterers, but that doesn't

                      mean a wife shrugs her shoulders when she finds out

                        her husband has been repeatedly cheating on her.

                                                                      [2]


      C. Elections have consequences.

          1) Abimelech's campaign was similar to an election.

              a) This man, who was the son of Gideon, wanted to rule

                    his section of Israel after his father's death.

              b) Israel did not have kings at this point, but God had

                    raised up leaders from the people - Judges.

          2) Abimelech wanted to shorten the process.

              a) He proposes himself as their new leader.

              b) He assumes that his family will take a leading role,

                    which would result in a multitude of leaders.

                  1> Local leadership in Pakistan follows this principle

                        today.

                  2> Descendants of ancient holy men inherit leadership.

          3) He gives reasons why he is preferable.

              a) He has a close kinship with Shechem.

                  1> His mother was from the area, unlike the mothers of

                        his half-brothers.

                  2> (Every politician wants a tie-in like this - "I am

                        one of you!")

                  3> He is suggesting one leader would be a lesser evil

                        than a mob of leaders.

              b) They elect him by acclamation.

              c) They also give him money to hire a staff.

                  1> They do some dirty tricks.

                  2> This being the Old Testament, the dirty tricks

                       involve murdering all 70 siblings of Abimelech.

                      A> As has often happened in history, one gets away.

          4) It doesn't end well.

              a) The citizens get tired of him and attempt to overthrow

                    him.

              b) He slaughters them in return, but ends up getting

                    killed himself when a woman drops a rock on him.

              c) In the end, the Israelites go back to God's system

                    and have judges.

                  1> Elected officials are too much trouble!


III. Some avoid evil by never compromising with it.

      A. The best choice might be to not choose at all.

          1) A good number of Americans never vote in any election.

              a) The number who participate has been steadily declining.

              b) We may drop below 50% this election.

              c) The Australians achieve a voting rate of over 90% but

                    they do this by making voting mandatory (they are

                       fined if they don't), they do it on a Sunday,

                          and they throw beer parties for everyone.

          2) It is also true of churches.

              a) Our business meetings barely make a quorum, the minimum

                    number needed to make decisions.

              b) It is a low number - only 10% of members.

              c) Yet this small group decides who will lead us, how we

                    will spend YOUR money, what projects we will take on.

              d) It doesn't seem very fair, but that is our system, in

                    this church and in the nation.


      B. Spurgeon's advice.

          1) Spurgeon was the star preacher of Victorian England, much

                like our Billy Graham.

          2) A quote of his has gotten a lot of play on the internet

                recently: "Of two evils, choose none."

              a) The gist is, instead of choosing the lesser of evils

                    we must reject both evils.

              b) An American revivalist named Michael Marcavage, who

                    began the ministry called "Repent America," has

                       expanded Spurgeon's idea:


                 "Of two evils, choose neither.

                  Christians must turn from the endless cycle of voting

                     for the lesser of evils and expecting an

                        unrighteous act to produce a righteous result...

                  Choosing the lesser of two evils is still evil, and

                     never should we do evil that good may come."     [3]


              c) This comes from a man who has been jailed for preaching

                    against abortion and homosexuality so he takes it

                       seriously.

                  1> Is he being too extreme?

                  2> After all, depending on how strict you are about

                        evil, we would never be able to elect anyone,

                           in government or in the church.

                  3> I believe an ultra-pure approach to politics is

                        doomed to failure.  Even Spurgeon believed

                           Christians should vote.


IV. You can avoid direct and obvious evil.

      A. We can accept imperfection but reject high-level evil.

          1) The moral quality of candidates does matter.

              a) Even though we are all sinners, some sin a lot more.

              b) Can a Christian vote for someone who has been proved to

                    be an adulterer - or has enabled an adulterer?

              c) What about someone proved to be a liar, or has cheated

                    on taxes, or avoided military service, or says one

                       thing behind closed doors and another to public

                          audiences?

          2) You have to decide how much sin you can stomach.


      B. Many Christians vote on the basis of "deal-breakers."

          1) There are some issues that they cannot compromise on.

          2) Their candidate may take some stands they disagree with,

                and the candidate may have some flaws they can live with,

                   but on certain points we take a stand.

          3) What would your deal-breakers be?

              a) For many Christians, abortion would be one.

                  1> Killing innocent children should never be allowed.

                  2> Candidates themselves do not have the means to

                        outlaw abortion, but they have a role in picking

                           Supreme Court justices who can.

              b) Other people take their stand on climate change, or

                    racism, or the right for a woman to choose an

                       abortion, or gun rights.

                  1> You have to decide where no compromise is allowed.


      C. The comparing of sins can have unintended consequences.


            A priest in England preached a sermon that said it was

               morally justifiable for the poor to shoplift.

            Father Tim Jones said that he did not believe it was right

               for people to shoplift but maintained it was the "least

                  worst option" for people in desperate situations.


            He gave the example of prisoners being released from prison

               without benefits or other financial assistance.

            He said it was for better for people in such circumstances

               to turn to shoplifting from large retailers rather than

                  turning to prostitution, mugging or burglary.


            He said, "My advice does not contradict the Bible's eighth

               commandment [do not steal] because God's love for the

                  poor and despised outweighs the property rights of

                     the rich."


            A spokesman for an English supermarket chain argued that

               shoplifting affected hardworking store staff more than

                  the rich.

            He challenged the priest to repeat his sermon before the

               local store's workers and see how they responded.

                                                                   #65344


  V. Perhaps you can find another way.

      A. We often frame our choices too narrowly.

          1) We may focus on "a" and "b" but perhaps there is a "c".

          2) 1 Corinthians 10:13 says:


             "No temptation has overtaken you except what is common to

                 mankind.

              And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted [or,

                 tested] beyond what you can bear.

              But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out

                 so that you can endure it."


      B. There are candidates other than Trump and Clinton.

          1) The dilemma for Christians is that anyone else is unlikely

                to win.

              a) Is this "throwing your vote away"?

              b) Not necessarily.

                  1> It is not the duty of Christians to vote for a

                        winner.

                  2> It is your duty to vote for the most appropriate

                        candidate.

          2) Some outsiders have done well.

              a) Back in the mid-1800s, the Republicans were a minor

                    party and only a few years old.

                  1> Whigs and Democrats had been the main parties.

                  2> But the Whigs disintegrated over abolition.

              b) An obscure lawyer from won the election while getting

                    less than 40% of the popular vote.

                  1> He did OK.

                  2> All agree Abraham Lincoln changed America forever.


      C. God determines the outcome of every election.

          1) Maybe he wants to punish us... in the Old Testament some

                of the kings served this purpose.

          2) Whoever wins, support them as much as your conscience allows.

              a) The office is more important than the person.

              b) Once in office, some politicians change - for the better.


         Chester Arthur was a political hack.

            Throughout his career he got ahead by patronage.

         In 1871 he was appointed Collector of the Port of New York and

            used his 1,000 employees to further the partisan interests

               of the Republican party.

         His salary was $6,500 but he got to keep a percentage of the

            cargoes and fines and so made $50,000 a year, more than the

               President of the United States.

         In 1878 political reformers cleaned out the New York political

            machine and Arthur was fired.


         In spite of this, the Republicans chose Arthur to be their

            Vice President in 1880 because he had been loyal.

         It was his first and only election, and he and Garfield

            narrowly won.

         A year later, Garfield was assassinated and political hack

            Arthur became the 21st President of the United States.


         As President he surprised both friends and enemies when he

            followed his own light and became a reformer.

         He called for both Civil Service reform and sound monetary

            policies.

         He fought to abolish the income tax and lowered tariffs.

            He vetoed a Chinese exclusion bill and wasteful projects.


         Going against his Republican Party, he supported the first

            comprehensive United States Civil Service legislation.

         It was the beginning of a new era of reform in national

            politics.

         From this point on, government jobs were given based on a

            person's ability instead of a person's politics.


         All of this made the Republican party mad and cost him the

            nomination for a second term.

         It didn't really matter because he had an unrevealed sickness

            and died a year and a half after leaving the Presidency.


         Journalist Alexander McClure later wrote, "No man ever entered

            the Presidency so profoundly and widely distrusted as

               Chester Alan Arthur, and no one ever retired ... more

                  generally respected, alike by political friend and foe."

                                                                   #65346


      D. Even in this election, trust that God knows what he is doing

            - no matter who wins.



=========================================================================

SOURCES FOR ILLUSTRATIONS USED IN THIS SERMON:


1. Wikipedia.org, Argo (2012 film), <link>.


2. Lesser of Two Evils? by Russell Moore, Christianity Today, March 2,

      2016; <link>.


3. Misusing Spurgeons Two Evils Quote, by Kevin Williams, 8 Jun 2016;

      <link>.


#65344  Priest Says Shoplifting Is Justified, by Rev. David Holwick,

           adapted from "Priest: Shoplifting is Least Worst Option for

           Poor," by Charles Boyd, Christian Today reporter, 22 Dec 2009;

           <link>.


#65346  The Political Hack Who Turned Out Okay, Rev. David Holwick,

           adapted from "Chester Arthur," <link>

           and Wikipedia.org, "Chester A. Arthur," <link>.


These and 35,000 others are part of the Kerux database that can be

downloaded, absolutely free, at http://www.holwick.com/database.html

=========================================================================


Copyright © 2024 by Rev. David Holwick

Created with the Freeware Edition of HelpNDoc: Free PDF documentation generator